Some background on HP Networking

I’ve made no secret that I’m a big fan of HP Networking. I like to thing that my belief in their product is based on positive experience and positive results under numerous deployment circumstances (ranging from small business to major government and university campus deployments I’ve been involved with). I believe most particularly that they have had the best edge switches on the market for a decade now and have become a solid player in the distribution and core layers of the LAN over the last 5 years.

One thing that frustrates me though is the impossibility of finding out information about HP networking that is not strictly technical. Their product information and documentation is probably the best around and their engineering training is also first rate. Trying to find out about the history of HP Networking is a something that’s a lot more difficult to turn up. HP has either been on the IETF committee for or invented some of the most significant aspects of Later-2 networking but for some reason they don’t seem to like to talk about it.

Anyway, I pumped one of my sources at HP and got the following out of them. I’m sure that there will be more to come (which I will append to this post) once their more experienced colleagues read this.

The HP Networking story

Throughout its long history, HP has distinguished itself as one of the most innovative and accomplished companies in the computing industry. From electronic test instruments and calculators to large and small computer systems, printers, and networking technologies, HP has led the way.

In the early 1980s, HP opened the doors on its networking business in Roseville, California. HP’s networking division focused on providing advanced, competitive, and timely technology to give its customers reliable and compelling value.

In 1987, HP development engineers invented key elements of 10Base-T, and drove the twisted pair standard that helped promote Ethernet to commercial viability by enabling it to run on low-cost telephone wiring already installed in commercial buildings — and the networking market took off.

Other important innovations from HP followed, including the industry’s first stackable 10Base-T hubs in 1990.

HP quickly became a leader in 10/100Base-T Ethernet switches, and in 1998 the HP ProCurve 4000 series switch broke below the $100 per port 10/100 price barrier.

In 1998, HP’s networking division became ProCurve Networking.

By 2003, ProCurve Networking became the second-largest global enterprise networking vendor in terms of revenue and ports (both PoE and non-PoE). According to Dell’Oro, the Ethernet switching market has grown by 76 percent between 2000 and 2010, while HP Networking has grown by more than twice that, with 166 percent growth over the same period.

In 1998, HP recognized that traditional networks with expensive, complex core devices surrounded by less expensive and less sophisticated access devices couldn’t support the performance, security, and multimedia application requirements coming to the network. Thus, HP created the HP Adaptive EDGE Architecture (AEA), which was introduced in 2000. This revolutionary (for the time) architectural model recognized that network device intelligence needed to be distributed throughout the network, including at the network edge. HP AEA became the architectural root of what has evolved into the HP FlexNetwork Architecture; and has been embodied in every networking product as well as every generation of HP custom-designed networking ASIC (application-specific integrated circuit) since 1998.

There you have it for now. That’s maybe 10% of the history of what is the world’s second largest networking company that should be accessible on The Internet.

 

P.S. The information on Wikipedia (http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/HP_Networking and http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/ProCurve) is awful. The official HP History site (http://www8.hp.com/us/en/hp-information/about-hp/history/history.html) barely mentions networking at all

About these ads

ASIC or Merchant Silicon – HP Switches

Another re-post I’m afraid. I have a bad cold and can’t concentrate. the original post is at http://h30507.www3.hp.com/t5/HP-Networking/ProVision-Inside/ba-p/94329. This was my weigh-in on the debate over what was preferable to use in network switches following HP’s acquisition of 3COM (since HP has always focused on ASIC whilst 3COM was pretty much all MS). Here we go…

 

Whilst initially it might look like there might be some conflict at HP between merchant Silicon (i.e.. A-series and other 3Com acquisitions) and ASIC (i.e.. E-series or legacy ProCurve) I believe that a valid strategy exists for both.

In Data Centre space, standards are king. MPLS, BGP, OSPF, etc. Everything has to interoperate cleanly and it is unlikely in the extreme to encounter a mono-vendor environment when taking into account: switches, routers, firewalls, load balancers, wan accelerators, traffic shapers, etc. In this sort of environment, merchant silicon makes perfect sense for switches and routers. New technology is rarely introduced into the core of a DC environment; and the fundamentals change glacially slowly. I think the IPv6 (and its associated routing protocols) is the only technology likely to start becoming prevalent as a core component of DCs that is much less than 10 years old. With such tried and true technology, it makes sense to use less expensive and more standardised Merchant Silicon than investing time in developing customing ASICs that have features that will never be used.

Out on the edge, the reverse is true. VoIP, UC, Web 2.0 (3.0, 4.0…), and other emerging technologies along with the vast increase in component performance makes customised technology not only advantageous, but necessary. Most organisations these days are DC-centric but still require a number of technologies to be deployed at the edge/branch level including: PABX, Switching, Routing, Security, Wan Acceleration, Print Server, etc. Historically this has meant a fairly substantial wiring cupboard (or more likely a full server room/rack) to be implemented at each branch along with associated cooling and power redundancy. Using the ProVision-based E8200/E5400 most if not all these functions can be consolidated into a single, highly-available device. This offers both cost and efficiency savings and will certainly appeal to those interested in Green IT.

It’s for this reason that I’ve started to think of the ProVision switches as “Application Switches” with their own niche that other vendors are woefully behind. Unlike so-called Integrated Service devices which offer extremely cut-down versions of the services their are purported to support, the ProVision Application Switch architecture allows the deployment of multiple full-blown systems (often integrating other leading vendor technologies) into a ludicrously small platform.

Rather than diminish the importance of the legacy ProVision architecture, I believe that the introduction of the A-Series range has created a differentiation that has clarified the role of a product that is years in advance of its competitors.

Michael